
We started communicating in the forum created for the team
report as soon as the forum was opened, and we formed our group even before the
course started. We were one of the first teams to be set up, the third one in
fact.
Everyone in my team was very up front and clear about their
goals for this paper, and about their general abilities. They were up for the
challenge, were available for whenever we needed something done for the report,
and they opened their homes for our meetings.
We created a Facebook account as soon as the group was
formed, so that we could communicate more easily, but we also exchanged emails
and text messages. We also had a few Skype sessions and met in person three
times. Therefore, communication within our group was excellent!
I don’t believe we played any specific Belbin team roles in
our team, but we definitely showed features from some of these roles. We
nominated a leader – Nadine – and we identified her as being the “Plant” role. She
came up with many ideas for how we should address the objectives for the report
and most definitely, when we had an issue with the content of the report at the
very end; she came up with a very good solution on how we could fix the issue.
We can say that Nicole was our “Co-ordinator”, she was very
good at identifying what had to be done, added it to our minutes for follow
ups, and she also helped us to focus
in our tasks. Melinda was definitely our “Resource Investigator”, she was the
one with really good contacts for the interviews and she organized them very promptly
and very efficiently. I believe that I was the “Implementer”, since I am crazy
about meeting deadlines and I collected everybody’s ideas and work to put it all
together and produce the report.
We worked really well together and we completed all our
tasks. The only downside was that we identified, in the very last week before
the report was due; that we hadn’t covered the “Ethical” concerns surrounding
our topics properly. We realised that we had missed very import points in
regards to the ethical questions.
So as a team, we decided that we would change the content of
the report slightly to try and address the ethical questions. However, by doing
that we disrupted the entire final editing process, and therefore our report
was not finished at the highest standard that we planned for. We were all aware
there would be a compromise, but we decided to take the risk.
Nonetheless, I believe we achieved a lot in a short period
of time, produced a very good report and most of all worked well together…
…just as I was finishing writing this blog, I saw that our
grades for the report were already available at the Stream website….We got an
“A”!!!! That is the proof of the good
work we did together!!!
Congratulations to my team!! The “A” team!!